Ica Radakovic 1 month ago "No need to isolate the new virus, we have its genetic sequence": Really? "Isolate" means: "There it is, we see DIRECT evidence of it, it's not attached to anything else, it's not possibly hidden in a glob of cellular material, it's not just a piece of some decaying old virus, it's not a random chunk of DNA or RNA, it's not a Maybe floating in a soup of cells in a dish, it's not an assumption based on what we're predisposed to find..." It's the difference between saying WE HAVE DIRECT EVIDENCE OF THE VIRUS and WE HAVE SOME STUFF THAT MIGHT CONTAIN A VIRUS IF WE'RE LUCKY.
In past articles, I've detailed how large coherent studies should be done (but aren't), using electron microscopy, to determine a) whether or not a new virus has been discovered, and b) how probable it is that the virus, if it exists, is causing harm to some people (whose immune systems are already compromised).
Nothing is riding on all this except the immediate future of the human race---since political leaders have decided to destroy untold numbers of jobs, businesses, and lives, all based on a story about a new pandemic virus
As per Dr Lanka’s court case, measles has NOT even been isolated appropriately with controls, hence NO VIRUS has ever been isolated as there were no controls EVER. No proof that these so called ‘viruses’ they are seeing in DYING cell cultures CAUSE disease either - correlation does not equal causation. But yet they take that same ‘genetic’ material mix it up in a witches brew and inject it into babies...vaccines are biological warfare.
admin 
Ica Radakovic
1 month ago
"No need to isolate the new virus, we have its genetic sequence": Really?
"Isolate" means: "There it is, we see DIRECT evidence of it, it's not attached to anything else, it's not possibly hidden in a glob of cellular material, it's not just a piece of some decaying old virus, it's not a random chunk of DNA or RNA, it's not a Maybe floating in a soup of cells in a dish, it's not an assumption based on what we're predisposed to find..."
It's the difference between saying WE HAVE DIRECT EVIDENCE OF THE VIRUS and WE HAVE SOME STUFF THAT MIGHT CONTAIN A VIRUS IF WE'RE LUCKY.
In past articles, I've detailed how large coherent studies should be done (but aren't), using electron microscopy, to determine a) whether or not a new virus has been discovered, and b) how probable it is that the virus, if it exists, is causing harm to some people (whose immune systems are already compromised).
Nothing is riding on all this except the immediate future of the human race---since political leaders have decided to destroy untold numbers of jobs, businesses, and lives, all based on a story about a new pandemic virus
As per Dr Lanka’s court case, measles has NOT even been isolated appropriately with controls, hence NO VIRUS has ever been isolated as there were no controls EVER. No proof that these so called ‘viruses’ they are seeing in DYING cell cultures CAUSE disease either - correlation does not equal causation. But yet they take that same ‘genetic’ material mix it up in a witches brew and inject it into babies...vaccines are biological warfare.